This week we explored commercial environments in photography and looked at whether there is a difference between commercial photography and art. Although there is a clear difference in their intended audiences and market, the end result is the same, the aim is to gain income from the work. This means that ultimately all photography could be considered as commercial, and it is not just confined to editorial or advertising markets. What is also important to remember is that it is always the client who sets the rules for photography because they want content that matches their brand and their budget. With the rise of digital technology and social media this has created an increased demand for images and quality content but it has also made the market far more competitive.
In the publishing sector, many publications no longer have printed editions and have instead created online publications. Their revenue has decreased and therefore so have their budgets, meaning that editorial work is now sparse and often poorly paid. The rise of mobile phone technology and citizen journalism has also meant that many publications no longer need to pay for images and instead publish submissions from their viewers at no cost to themselves, further impacting on this market. In an interview for the British Journal of Photography, Emma Bowkett, director of photography at the FT Weekend Magazine describes how online publication has changed the type of content needed and says:
“There has been a shift of focus from print to digital in newspapers and for our magazine, the challenge is to bring long-form journalism and visually rich content to this platform. We are working more with data and video to create a reader experience that is way beyond what we could achieve in print. It’s an interesting time for experimentation.” (Bowkett, Emma. 2017)
Advertising work has also had to change and adapt to the demand for online content and a changing audience. The style of advertising has changed to reflect global brand identities and the aim of creating brand loyal communities. There has also been a shift to using stock images for advertising campaigns rather than commissioning work, however, there is still a good market for photographers. Stock photography is a potential commercial market for photographers to consider, however, it is important to consider the type of licensing and payment that will be received through this type of commercial market, and also what type of photographs are sold as all control over the use of these images is lost once sold as stock photography. It is, however, a good market to consider as a supplement to earnings.
One area of commercial photography that is still a good market and which is showing interesting and dynamic trends, is that of fashion photography. There has been an increasing trend towards a merging of fine art and fashion photography which has resulted in some incredible editorial work. A fine art fashion photographer whose work I admire is Lindsay Adler, an artist who has established herself firmly within the industry as both a photographer (doing commissioned fashion and editorial photography, as well as selling fine art prints) and an educator (selling books, tutorials and workshops). She is an example of a photographer who has fully understood the modern commercial market and has created multiple income streams and a successful personal brand.

References: Creative Brief Emma Bowkett. 2017. The British Journal of Photography, 164(7858), pp. 84-85.

